Cities are Cesspools of Socialism?

I got a fiery reply to my offhand Facebook comment that "Cities are cesspools of socialism". I thought I would share my rejoinder.

I wasn't judging city people, I was judging city government. I'm a happy anarchist, looking forward to the day when humans live in a voluntary society based on non-violence, creativity, and free association. (Not that I think I'll see it in my lifetime, but maybe my children's children's children.) I don't put all city people in one basket, and I don't put all small town people in the same basket. There are great people no matter where you go. There also are nasty, brutish, bitter people in every city and every small town. There are opportunities in big cities that are unavailable in small towns, but there are opportunities in small towns that aren't available in big cities.

The US dollar is on the verge of hyper-inflation and possible meltdown. And cities will quickly become disaster areas when food service, water, sewage, trash service, police, fire, and electricity become unreliable because the politics and money that keep all of that running become unstable. I study economics, history, science, politics, and philosophy enough to know that the US empire cannot continue. The more politicians keep propping it up with wars, taxes, laws, cops, jails, guns, bombs, and debt, the harder it will fall. And state and city governments will fall as well. We won't be immune out here in the woods, but we're not totally dependent on government largesse, the way a city is. That's all I was talking about.

"I would prefer a socialistic approach to a capitalistic one, don't you concur?"

I prefer a sociable approach. And socialism is anti-social and violent. I prefer freedom. I don't like politicians pointing guns at my head or threatening to do so.

"After all, if we lived in a communist or socialist country, all of its citizens would be provided for. All would have gainful employment, shelter, food and clothing."

That's what the promise says, but history, logic, and morality say otherwise. I don't mind you living in a socialist society if you choose, but please let me choose to opt out. Socialism and communism are no problem until they use guns to force everyone to conform to their system.

"Instead we live in a capitalistic Republic where profits are put ahead of people."

The "capitalist republic" we live in is a fiction. Both of those words are filled with false premises. The word "republic" is a fiction because I supposedly have "representatives" but they are under no legal or contractual obligation to actually represent my wishes or needs. All government is a fiction in that way; We are obligated to the state, but the state is not obligated to us. The word "capitalist" is also a fiction, because Karl Marx misused the word when he coined it. All "capital" refers to is the tools you use to provide your product or service. So "capitalism" refers to a business which puts money from profits back into its tools and buildings in order to improve products and services. We don't live in a "capitalist" system. The right word is "mercantilism". Mercantilism is a system where politicians take money by force from some of the people and give it to their preferred big donor corporations. A mercantilist system syphons money from the less politically-connected "little guys" in order to fund fat cat politically well-connected donors.

The War on Immigrants

The war on immigrants is the same as any other war.

Governments use wars to distract from problems they have created at home. Riding on the wave of mob-hysteria created by their wars, they expand their power, wealth, and dominance.

War is the health of the state. Even if there seems to be good reasons for going to war, as in WWI & WWII, it's not worth the price we pay in lost freedom, wrecked lives, and ruined economies.

Americans fought the Revolutionary War and the War of 1812 to avoid the single-digit taxation from England. How is America's level of taxation now?

Americans fought WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam, and the Cold War, in order to fight the spread of Socialism, Fascism, and Communism. How is America's level of Socialism, Fascism, and Communism now? Things get worse with every war and with every election cycle.

Every war, large or small, is used as an excuse to expand the dominance of the state and shrink the rights of individuals. War is just a way to get the populace riled up and running to their masters for protection. And the Spin-Doctors keep Waggin the Dog!

Strong borders will cost billions of dollars, and those billions will go to the usual military-industrial corporations, making those corporations more dominant in US policy-making.

Those corporations already own the big media, the Pentagon, the White House, big pharma, big politicians, etc. They get money from big-government programs like the "border war", the "drug war", the "war on climate change", the "War on Terror", and so on. And then they use that money to drum up new wars and worries - false flag operations, whatever it takes, ... Whatever they think they can get away with.

I suggest We Don't Get Fooled Again.

The R's & D's play "good cop, bad cop" in a sleazy display of Political Theater, and everyone lines up to cheer their team. No matter which side you are cheering for, big government and big corporations are always the winners, while tax-payers and basic human rights are always the losers.

Better to admit that Constitutional Representative government is a failed experiment, many times over. Let's start looking for ways to dismantle the biggest, most expensive government in the known universe.

The Pledge Of Allegiance

Republican politicians love the Pledge of Allegiance. There are at least three things wrong the Pledge of Allegiance, even from the Conservative point-of-view.

1. The pledge was written by the socialist, Francis Bellamy. The original intent was to include the word "equality" along with "liberty and justice for all". The Pledge has been change a couple times already; if they put in the word "equality" will you still think the Pledge is somehow a good idea? I would think we want to inculcate into our kids a spirit of self reliance and tolerance. The pledge teaches Orwellian (even Hitlerian) "group-think" and "God is on our side". In later years, this attitude blossoms into the ugly attitude of "America, Love It or Leave It". If "love it or leave it" was a principle of the founders, there would be no provision for amending the U.S. Constitution.

2. Oaths of Allegiance are a hallmark of tyrannies throughout history. There is no place for "oaths of allegiance" in a country that calls itself free and just (and Christian). Many Christian churches originally (and correctly) opposed the Pledge of Allegiance. The Catholic Knights of Columbus led the movement to add the words "under God", in the spirit of "if we can't beat them, we'll join them".

3. Most importantly, the brouhaha over the Pledge and "under God" is nothing but a distraction from more important issues. Socialist propaganda always hammers on the petty fears and populist trivia in order to distract from the real political issues (state, federal, and local) that are destroying families and businesses, i.e., Regulation, Welfare, Wars, Taxes, Laws, Corporate Welfare, Taxes, Wars, Taxes, ...

I'm sure most voters would know very little about any of these historical or economic realities. They live in a world of "let's pretend that if we get our kids to memorize a few words (especially with the word "God" in there someplace), they will grow up to be better citizens and better Christians". Never mind that the long-term effect of such oaths is a general devotion to collectivist thinking. Ironically for conservative pledge-promoters, collectivism is antithetical to "liberty and justice for all".

Conservatives jump on the Pledge Of Allegiance bandwagon to get the attention of patriotic voters who were taught to have reverence “for God and Country”. But voting Republican instead of Democrat simply means heading for Socialism at 80mph instead of 100mph.

Democrats are "tax and spend", forcing us to live with a crippled economy. / Republicans are "borrow, print more money, and spend", forcing our children to live with a crippled economy.